Van Hoff v. Redevelopment Agency of San Francisco

348 U.S. 897, 75 S. Ct. 214, 99 L. Ed. 705, 1954 U.S. LEXIS 1420
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 6, 1954·No. No. 87·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

District Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took [898]*898no part in the consideration or decision of this application. Martin J. Jarvis for petitioners. Dion R. Holm and John Elmer Barricklo for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Hoff v. Redevelopment Agency of San Francisco, 348 U.S. 897, 75 S. Ct. 214, 99 L. Ed. 705, 1954 U.S. LEXIS 1420 (1954).

348 U.S. 897 (Van Hoff v. Redevelopment Agency of San Francisco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National City Business Ass'n v. City of National City
146 Cal. App. 3d 1060 (California Court of Appeal, 1983)
L & M Professional Consultants, Inc. v. Ferreira
146 Cal. App. 3d 1038 (California Court of Appeal, 1983)
Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1979
Boise Redevelopment Agency v. Yick Kong Corp.
499 P.2d 575 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1972)
Levin v. Tp. Committee of Tp. of Bridgewater
274 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1971)
Redevelopment Agency v. Malaki
216 Cal. App. 2d 480 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
Miller v. City of Tacoma
378 P.2d 464 (Washington Supreme Court, 1963)
Takata v. City of Los Angeles
184 Cal. App. 2d 154 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)
Redevelopment Commission v. Security National Bank of Greensboro
114 S.E.2d 688 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
Davis v. City of Lubbock
326 S.W.2d 699 (Texas Supreme Court, 1959)