Van Hoesen v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co.

423 N.E.2d 817, 53 N.Y.2d 918, 441 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2483
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 14, 1981
StatusPublished

This text of 423 N.E.2d 817 (Van Hoesen v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Hoesen v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co., 423 N.E.2d 817, 53 N.Y.2d 918, 441 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2483 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order reversed, with costs, and the order of Supreme Court, Fulton County, reinstated. The order of Supreme Court approving the settlement of the action includes an equitable apportionment of attorney’s fees. That order unambiguously requires Lumbermens to pay to plaintiff Kenneth Van Hoesen an amount equal to one third of the full value of his workers’ compensation claim which has been computed by the board in the sum of $14,460:80.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 N.E.2d 817, 53 N.Y.2d 918, 441 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-hoesen-v-f-m-schaefer-brewing-co-ny-1981.