Van Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement

Fourth Circuit

Van Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement

109 F. App'x 624

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 28, 2004·No. No. 04-6731·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Martina Van Hoef seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint which the district court construed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Van Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, No. CA-04-76 (E.D.Va. Mar. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Martina Van Hoef seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint which the district court construed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Van Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, No. CA-04-76 (E.D.Va. Mar. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Van Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, 109 F. App'x 624 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

109 F. App'x 624 (Van Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related