Van Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
This text of 109 F. App'x 624 (Van Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Martina Van Hoef seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint which the district court construed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Van Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, No. CA-04-76 (E.D.Va. Mar. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 F. App'x 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-hoef-v-us-immigration-customs-enforcement-ca4-2004.