Van Gorkom v. Deutsche Bank

Fourth Circuit

Van Gorkom v. Deutsche Bank

254 F. App'x 274

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 20, 2007

Docket07-1785

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 F. App'x 274 (Van Gorkom v. Deutsche Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Gorkom v. Deutsche Bank, 254 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Karen Van Gorkom appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 41(b) motion to dismiss her claims for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Van Gorkom v. Deutsche Bank, No. 1:04-cv-02802-WDQ (D.Md. July 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Karen Van Gorkom appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 41(b) motion to dismiss her claims for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Van Gorkom v. Deutsche Bank, No. 1:04-cv-02802-WDQ (D.Md. July 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 F. App'x 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-gorkom-v-deutsche-bank-ca4-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack