Van Gorder v. Masterplanned, Inc.

78 N.Y.2d 1106
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 25, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 78 N.Y.2d 1106 (Van Gorder v. Masterplanned, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Gorder v. Masterplanned, Inc., 78 N.Y.2d 1106 (N.Y. 1991).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment denied.

Inasmuch as a triable issue of fact exists as to whether plaintiffs, who claim to have acquired title to defendant’s property by adverse possession, acknowledged during the stat[1108]*1108utory 10-year period that actual ownership of the property rested with defendant, summary judgment should not have been awarded to plaintiffs. Such a concession, if found by the trier of fact to exist, would negate an essential element of plaintiffs’ adverse possession claim, namely, that they continued to possess the property under a claim of right throughout the statutory period (see, City of Tonawanda v Ellicott Cr. Homeowners Assn., 86 AD2d 118, 123; see also, Van Valkenburgh v Lutz, 304 NY 95, 99).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kagan v. Kropp
2024 NY Slip Op 03474 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Salzberg v. Sena
166 N.Y.S.3d 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
SANDORO, JAMES T. v. 9274 GROUP, INC.
114 A.D.3d 1276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Merget v. Westbury Properties, LLC
65 A.D.3d 1102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Larsen v. Hanson
58 A.D.3d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Blumenfeld v. DeLuca
24 A.D.3d 405 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Walling v. Przybylo
24 A.D.3d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Krog v. Village of Ellicottville
1 Misc. 3d 552 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Falco v. Pollitts
298 A.D.2d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
City of New York v. Sarnelli Bros.
280 A.D.2d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Birkholz v. Wells
272 A.D.2d 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Solow v. Liebman
253 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
MAG Associates, Inc. v. SDR Realty, Inc.
247 A.D.2d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Shults v. Geary
241 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Serbalik v. Gray
240 A.D.2d 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Schultz v. Dew
1997 SD 72 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
Guariglia v. Blima Homes, Inc.
675 N.E.2d 466 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Dittmer v. Jacwin Farms, Inc.
224 A.D.2d 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Guariglia v. Blima Homes, Inc.
224 A.D.2d 388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Reynolds v. Arnold
221 A.D.2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 N.Y.2d 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-gorder-v-masterplanned-inc-ny-1991.