Van Gilder v. Kamper

Appellate Court of Illinois

Van Gilder v. Kamper

192 Ill. App. 25

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedFebruary 4, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,049

StatusPublished

This text of 192 Ill. App. 25 (Van Gilder v. Kamper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Gilder v. Kamper, 192 Ill. App. 25 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Brokers, § 90*—evidence as to ability,of purchaser to perform. In an action by a broker for a real estate commission, where although it appeared that a third party did not have title to property which he agreed to exchange for defendant’s, there was evidence tending to prove that he had a right to demand that the property be deeded to himself or to any one whom he might designate, and he actually procured the delivery of the property to the defendant in exchange for the property mentioned in the contract as belonging to the defendant, evidence held to require submission to the jury the question whether such third party was ready, able and willing to carry out his part of the contract for the exchange of the properties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Brokers, § 90*—evidence as to ability,of purchaser to perform. In an action by a broker for a real estate commission, where although it appeared that a third party did not have title to property which he agreed to exchange for defendant’s, there was evidence tending to prove that he had a right to demand that the property be deeded to himself or to any one whom he might designate, and he actually procured the delivery of the property to the defendant in exchange for the property mentioned in the contract as belonging to the defendant, evidence held to require submission to the jury the question whether such third party was ready, able and willing to carry out his part of the contract for the exchange of the properties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 Ill. App. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-gilder-v-kamper-illappct-1915.