Van Fossen v. Commissioner
This text of 4 F. App'x 526 (Van Fossen v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM2
Roland Van Fossen appeals pro se the Tax Court’s decision dismissing for failure to state a claim his Petition for Lien or Levy Action brought pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6330(d). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a), and we affirm:
The Tax Court properly concluded that Van Fossen’s challenge to his underlying federal income tax liability was precluded by his failure to file a petition for redetermination with the Tax Court pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6213(a). Because he had received statutory notices of deficiency for the tax liability, Van Fossen could not subsequently raise a challenge to the underlying liability. See 26 U.S.C. § 6330(c)(2)(B).
Van Fossen’s request to file his reply brief is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 F. App'x 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-fossen-v-commissioner-ca9-2001.