Van Fossen v. Commissioner

4 F. App'x 526
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2001·No. No. 00-70933; Tax Ct. No. 11269-99L·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Roland Van Fossen appeals pro se the Tax Court’s decision dismissing for failure to state a claim his Petition for Lien or Levy Action brought pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6330(d). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a), and we affirm:

The Tax Court properly concluded that Van Fossen’s challenge to his underlying federal income tax liability was precluded by his failure to file a petition for redetermination with the Tax Court pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6213(a). Because he had received statutory notices of deficiency for the tax liability, Van Fossen could not subsequently raise a challenge to the underlying liability. See 26 U.S.C. § 6330(c)(2)(B).

Van Fossen’s request to file his reply brief is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Fossen v. Commissioner, 4 F. App'x 526 (9th Cir. 2001).

4 F. App'x 526 (Van Fossen v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DESALVO v. COMMISSIONER
2004 T.C. Summary Opinion 166 (U.S. Tax Court, 2004)
Abu-Awad v. United States
294 F. Supp. 2d 879 (S.D. Texas, 2003)
Loofbourrow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
208 F. Supp. 2d 698 (S.D. Texas, 2002)