Van Eyken v. Happy Tours, Inc.

110 A.D.3d 1058, 974 N.Y.S.2d 259
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 30, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 A.D.3d 1058 (Van Eyken v. Happy Tours, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Eyken v. Happy Tours, Inc., 110 A.D.3d 1058, 974 N.Y.S.2d 259 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Farneti, J.), dated June 25, 2012, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The evidence submitted in support of the defendants’ motion failed to eliminate a triable issue of fact as to whether the stop by the subject bus caused a jerk or lurch that was unusual and violent (see Urquhart v New York City Tr. Auth., 85 NY2d 828 [1995]; Black v County of Dutchess, 87 AD3d 1097 [2011]).

Since the defendants did not meet their prima facie burden, it is unnecessary to determine whether the papers submitted by the plaintiff in opposition were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

San Andres v. County of Westchester
2019 NY Slip Op 4743 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D.3d 1058, 974 N.Y.S.2d 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-eyken-v-happy-tours-inc-nyappdiv-2013.