Van Etten v. Van Etten
23 N.Y.S. 711, 69 Hun 499, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 624
Opinion
It seems to me that title was plainly made an issue in the case by the defendant’s answer, and that the judgment of the county court is correct. The reasons for reversal of the judgment of the justice’s court were satisfactorily and sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the county judge, and I can see no reason for any further opinion. Let the judgment of the county court be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Etten v. Van Etten, 23 N.Y.S. 711, 69 Hun 499, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 624 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
23 N.Y.S. 711 (Van Etten v. Van Etten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kibbe v. Crossman
139 A.D. 338 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Marshall v. Burden
1910 OK 20 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)
Gillin v. Canary
19 Misc. 594 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)