Van Etten & Steele v. Jilson

6 Cal. 19
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 19 (Van Etten & Steele v. Jilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Etten & Steele v. Jilson, 6 Cal. 19 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

Justices of the Peace cannot take any jurisdiction by implication. The law gives them the authority to try the right to a mining claim where the value does not exceed two hundred dollars, but it confers no jurisdiction to give damages for an injury to a mining claim, or for its detention.

But this is not the case here. The plaintiff sues for the mining claim—that is the cause of his action. His prayer for damages might have been stricken out, or might have been disregarded. It ought not to have turned him out of Court. The rule is, “ Utile per inutile non vitiatur.” And, besides this, the Courts are always gentle and indulgent to pleadings before these inferior tribunals. Order of dismissal reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peninsular Trading & Fishing Co. v. Pacific Steam Whaling Co.
56 P. 604 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Armstrong v. Paul
1 Nev. 134 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1865)
Wratten v. Wilson
22 Cal. 465 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Swain v. Chase
12 Cal. 283 (California Supreme Court, 1859)
Freeman v. Powers
7 Cal. 104 (California Supreme Court, 1857)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-etten-steele-v-jilson-cal-1856.