Van Eman v. Cars Protection Plus, Inc.
738 N.W.2d 749, 480 Mich. 892, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2191
This text of 738 N.W.2d 749 (Van Eman v. Cars Protection Plus, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Van Eman v. Cars Protection Plus, Inc., 738 N.W.2d 749, 480 Mich. 892, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2191 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Matthew VAN EMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
C.A.R.S. PROTECTION PLUS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Hilliard
738 N.W.2d 749 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
738 N.W.2d 749, 480 Mich. 892, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-eman-v-cars-protection-plus-inc-mich-2007.