Van Dyke v. Ætna Life Insurance

91 S.E. 600, 173 N.C. 700, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 381
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 7, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 600 (Van Dyke v. Ætna Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Dyke v. Ætna Life Insurance, 91 S.E. 600, 173 N.C. 700, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 381 (N.C. 1917).

Opinion

PbR OukiaM.

All persons who have any interest in the insurance money for which the defendant is liable are parties to this action and are bound by the judgment, and it follows that the defendant will be fully protected by the payment of the money, which it admits to be due.

As was said in Hocutt v. R. R., 124 N. C., 217, the probability of a controversy between the wife and the children does not concern the defendant.

It is therefore unnecssary to consider the questions discussed in the briefs as to the right of the insured to change the beneficiary by his will.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henderson v. Matthews
224 S.E.2d 612 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976)
National Surety Corp. v. Sharpe
72 S.E.2d 109 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 600, 173 N.C. 700, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-dyke-v-tna-life-insurance-nc-1917.