Van Dyke v. Ætna Life Insurance
This text of 91 S.E. 600 (Van Dyke v. Ætna Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
All persons who have any interest in the insurance money for which the defendant is liable are parties to this action and are bound by the judgment, and it follows that the defendant will be fully protected by the payment of the money, which it admits to be due.
As was said in Hocutt v. R. R., 124 N. C., 217, the probability of a controversy between the wife and the children does not concern the defendant.
It is therefore unnecssary to consider the questions discussed in the briefs as to the right of the insured to change the beneficiary by his will.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 600, 173 N.C. 700, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-dyke-v-tna-life-insurance-nc-1917.