Van Dyk v. Van Dyk & Reeves, Inc.
157 N.E. 840, 245 N.Y. 516, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 666
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Dyk v. Van Dyk & Reeves, Inc., 157 N.E. 840, 245 N.Y. 516, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 666 (N.Y. 1927).
157 N.E. 840 (Van Dyk v. Van Dyk & Reeves, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Menin
115 F.2d 975 (Second Circuit, 1940)
Thomas Day Co. v. King
42 F.2d 421 (Ninth Circuit, 1930)