Van Dyck v. Van Dyck
252 So. 2d 241, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5964
Opinion
Plaintiff wife appeals a final judgment of divorce and assigns as error the amount of permanent alimony awarded.
Having examined the briefs and listened to the arguments of the parties, no clear abuse of the trial judge’s discretion has been shown. We therefore affirm. Beaty v. Beaty, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 54, Lasseter v. Lasseter, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 455 and Farr v. Farr, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 890.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Dyck v. Van Dyck, 252 So. 2d 241, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5964 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).
252 So. 2d 241 (Van Dyck v. Van Dyck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beaty v. Beaty
177 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Farr v. Farr
164 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Lasseter v. Lasseter
241 So. 2d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)