Van Dyck v. Van Beuren

New York Supreme Court

Van Dyck v. Van Beuren

2 Cai. Cas. 103

DecidedAugust 15, 1804

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 103 (Van Dyck v. Van Beuren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Dyck v. Van Beuren, 2 Cai. Cas. 103 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We admit the-general position, but as two of the judges whq sat when this case was argued were disposed to recommend a special verdict, unless the parties now agree to one, we shall order a stay of proceedings till a further argument.

1ST. B. — It was mentioned to the court, that a case was now pending in error, between the same parties, in which the very point now in question would receive a determination.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We admit the-general position, but as two of the judges whq sat when this case was argued were disposed to recommend a special verdict, unless the parties now agree to one, we shall order a stay of proceedings till a further argument.

1ST. B. — It was mentioned to the court, that a case was now pending in error, between the same parties, in which the very point now in question would receive a determination.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cai. Cas. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-dyck-v-van-beuren-nysupct-1804.