Van Duyne v. Caldwell Motors
This text of 177 A.2d 486 (Van Duyne v. Caldwell Motors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the County Court affirming the judgment entered in the Workmen’s Compensation [519]*519Division in favor of respondent because the Division did not have jurisdiction of the claim petition, is affirmed for the reasons stated by County Judge Mills. As he observed, the filing of a claim petition within the time prescribed by B. 8. 34:15-51 is a jurisdictional requirement. Schwarz v. Federal Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 29 N. J. Super. 374, 376 (App. Div. 1954); Scaglione v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., 46 N. J. Super. 363, 368 (App. Div. 1957).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 A.2d 486, 71 N.J. Super. 518, 1961 N.J. Super. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-duyne-v-caldwell-motors-njsuperctappdiv-1961.