Van Duyne v. Caldwell Motors

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Van Duyne v. Caldwell Motors

177 A.2d 486, 71 N.J. Super. 518, 1961 N.J. Super. LEXIS 439

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided December 20, 1961·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the County Court affirming the judgment entered in the Workmen’s Compensation [519] Division in favor of respondent because the Division did not have jurisdiction of the claim petition, is affirmed for the reasons stated by County Judge Mills. As he observed, the filing of a claim petition within the time prescribed by B. 8. 34:15-51 is a jurisdictional requirement. Schwarz v. Federal Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 29 N. J. Super. 374, 376 (App. Div. 1954); Scaglione v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., 46 N. J. Super. 363, 368 (App. Div. 1957).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the County Court affirming the judgment entered in the Workmen’s Compensation [519] Division in favor of respondent because the Division did not have jurisdiction of the claim petition, is affirmed for the reasons stated by County Judge Mills. As he observed, the filing of a claim petition within the time prescribed by B. 8. 34:15-51 is a jurisdictional requirement. Schwarz v. Federal Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 29 N. J. Super. 374, 376 (App. Div. 1954); Scaglione v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., 46 N. J. Super. 363, 368 (App. Div. 1957).

Van Duyne v. Caldwell Motors, 177 A.2d 486, 71 N.J. Super. 518, 1961 N.J. Super. LEXIS 439 (N.J. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

177 A.2d 486 (Van Duyne v. Caldwell Motors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related