Van Dusen v. McFaddin

128 S.W.2d 539, 1939 Tex. App. LEXIS 1131
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 20, 1939
DocketNo. 3453.
StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.W.2d 539 (Van Dusen v. McFaddin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Dusen v. McFaddin, 128 S.W.2d 539, 1939 Tex. App. LEXIS 1131 (Tex. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

COMBS, Justice.

This case is before us without briefs. On April 11, 1939, two days before the date of submission, appellants filed a motion requesting a postponement of submission in order that newly employed counsel might have time to prepare and file a brief. After considering the motion and appellees reply thereto we reached the conclusion that good cause for failure to file briefs was not shown, and on submission day overruled the motion. See art. 1848, as amended by Acts 1935, 44th Leg., ch. 90, sec. 1, p. 225, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 1848; Graves v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 104 S.W.2d 121, and authorities cited.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Graves v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co.
104 S.W.2d 121 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S.W.2d 539, 1939 Tex. App. LEXIS 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-dusen-v-mcfaddin-texapp-1939.