Van Dusen v. Martin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Van Dusen v. Martin

357 A.2d 513, 171 Conn. 726

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 4, 1976·Published

Opinion

The named defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied without prejudice on the appeal to full argument on the issue of the waiver of fees, costs and security.

The defendant Paul M. Vasington’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New [727] London County is denied without prejudice on the appeal to full argument on the issue of the waiver of fees, costs and security.

Paige J. Everin, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (named defendant). D. Michael Hurley, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (defendant Vasington). Judith I. Solomon, for the appellant (plaintiff), Argued May 4 decided May 4, 1976

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The named defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied without prejudice on the appeal to full argument on the issue of the waiver of fees, costs and security.

The defendant Paul M. Vasington’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New [727] London County is denied without prejudice on the appeal to full argument on the issue of the waiver of fees, costs and security.

Paige J. Everin, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (named defendant). D. Michael Hurley, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (defendant Vasington). Judith I. Solomon, for the appellant (plaintiff), Argued May 4 decided May 4, 1976

Van Dusen v. Martin, 357 A.2d 513, 171 Conn. 726 (Colo. 1976).

Pincite

357 A.2d 513 (Van Dusen v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.