Van Dusen v. Martin

357 A.2d 513, 171 Conn. 726
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 4, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 357 A.2d 513 (Van Dusen v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Dusen v. Martin, 357 A.2d 513, 171 Conn. 726 (Colo. 1976).

Opinion

The named defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied without prejudice on the appeal to full argument on the issue of the waiver of fees, costs and security.

The defendant Paul M. Vasington’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New [727]*727London County is denied without prejudice on the appeal to full argument on the issue of the waiver of fees, costs and security.

Paige J. Everin, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (named defendant). D. Michael Hurley, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (defendant Vasington). Judith I. Solomon, for the appellant (plaintiff), Argued May 4 decided May 4, 1976

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 A.2d 513, 171 Conn. 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-dusen-v-martin-conn-1976.