Van Dusen v. Kelleher

56 P. 35, 20 Wash. 716, 1899 Wash. LEXIS 228
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 7, 1899
DocketNo. 3120
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 56 P. 35 (Van Dusen v. Kelleher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Dusen v. Kelleher, 56 P. 35, 20 Wash. 716, 1899 Wash. LEXIS 228 (Wash. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At the hearing of this cause a motion was made by respondents to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The judgment appealed from was rendered on the 4th of May, 1898. Notice of appeal was served on May 18, 1898, but not filed until June 1, 1898. The appeal bond was served on May 18, 1898, and filed June 1, 1898. Section 4 of the appeal act of 1893 (Session Laws, p. 121, Bal. Code, § 6503), requires the notice of appeal to be filed within five days after service. Section 6 of the same act (Laws 1893, p. 122, Bal. Code, § 6505) provides that an appeal shall not become effectual for any purpose, unless the appeal bond be filed with the clerk of the court within five days after the notice of appeal is given or served. These requirements have been held to be jurisdictional. Hibbard v. Delanty, ante, p. 539.

The motion must prevail and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Estate of Yand
162 P.2d 434 (Washington Supreme Court, 1945)
Collins v. Kinnear
79 P. 995 (Washington Supreme Court, 1905)
Van Dusen v. Kelleher
65 P. 552 (Washington Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 P. 35, 20 Wash. 716, 1899 Wash. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-dusen-v-kelleher-wash-1899.