Van Dorn v. Van Dorn
3 N.J.L. 698
Opinion
were unanimously of opinion, that the widow could recover no more than the value of the third part of the land at the time of alienation; that the improvement since the sale by the husband, was not a subject'of dower, and that the same rule was also to govern in the assessment of damages.
Judgment for the demandant accordingly.
Cited in Coxe v. Higbie 6 Halst. 395; Chiswell v. Morris, 1 McC. 101;
Barnett v. Griffith, 12 C. E Gr. 206.
Approved Wheeler v. Kirtland, 12 C. E Gr. 534.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Dorn v. Van Dorn, 3 N.J.L. 698 (N.J. 1810).
3 N.J.L. 698 (Van Dorn v. Van Dorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.