Van Doren v. Walker

2 Cai. Cas. 373, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 417
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1805
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 373 (Van Doren v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Doren v. Walker, 2 Cai. Cas. 373, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 417 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As nothing is said about a constable’s being sworn, or having charge of the jury, the court cannot supply it by intendment. There are no words in the return to intend by. We might as well intend an issue joined, or a venire when nothing is stated. The justice must state, as the writ requires him, all -his proceedings, the whole history of the suit. When a proceeding so essential is omitted, we cannot consider it as done.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fink v. Hall
8 Johns. 437 (New York Supreme Court, 1811)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cai. Cas. 373, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-doren-v-walker-nysupct-1805.