Van Deventer v. Brown

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Van Deventer v. Brown

561 So. 2d 469, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3778, 1990 WL 68729

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 23, 1990

DocketNo. 90-00386

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 561 So. 2d 469 (Van Deventer v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Deventer v. Brown, 561 So. 2d 469, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3778, 1990 WL 68729 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing appellants’ initial brief in which appellants concede that our decision in Aspen v. Bayless, 552 So.2d 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), is controlling, and pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), we affirm the trial court’s order which denied appellants’ motion to tax costs and attorney’s fees. As in Aspen, we certify to the supreme court the following question of great importance:

CAN A NONPARTY RECOVER COSTS IT HAS INCURRED ON BEHALF OF A NAMED PARTY UNDER THE RULE AND STATUTES REGARDING OFFERS OF JUDGMENT, OR ARE COSTS RECOVERABLE UNDER THOSE PROVISIONS ONLY BY PARTIES WHO HAVE PAID COSTS OR INCURRED LIABILITY TO DO SO?

We further note that the Fifth District Court of Appeal has certified conflict to the supreme court on this issue in Hough v. Huffman, 555 So.2d 942 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

FRANK, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI