Van Develde v. Van Develde

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Van Develde v. Van Develde

33 Ohio C.C. Dec. 566, 22 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 277, 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 394

DecidedDecember 14, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Ohio C.C. Dec. 566 (Van Develde v. Van Develde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Develde v. Van Develde, 33 Ohio C.C. Dec. 566, 22 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 277, 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 394 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

HENRY, J.

The action below was brought to recover damages for the destruction of a will prior to the testator’s death, whereby plaintiffs were deprived of legacies. Demurrer to the petition was sustained and judgment rendered for defendants.

However wrongful such conduct as that here ascribed to the defendants may be, there appears to be no precedent for the remedy invoked. What right of the plaintiffs was invaded? They had no vested interest in the expected legacies during the testator’s lifetime. There was not even an inchoate right created in them by the mere execution and publication of the testator’s will containing provisions in their behalf.

The judgment is affirmed.

Winch and Marvin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HENRY, J.

The action below was brought to recover damages for the destruction of a will prior to the testator’s death, whereby plaintiffs were deprived of legacies. Demurrer to the petition was sustained and judgment rendered for defendants.

However wrongful such conduct as that here ascribed to the defendants may be, there appears to be no precedent for the remedy invoked. What right of the plaintiffs was invaded? They had no vested interest in the expected legacies during the testator’s lifetime. There was not even an inchoate right created in them by the mere execution and publication of the testator’s will containing provisions in their behalf.

The judgment is affirmed.

Winch and Marvin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Ohio C.C. Dec. 566, 22 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 277, 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-develde-v-van-develde-ohcirctcuyahoga-1908.