Van Deusen v. Rowley

1 Seld. Notes 130
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Van Deusen v. Rowley. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 N.Y. 358
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 13, 1853·Published

Opinion

The defendants, at the instance of Mrs. Van Deusen, their sister, were cited to account, as administrators, be[131]*131fore the surrogate of Columbia county. In taking the account, the surrogate charged the administrators with the value of twenty shares of the stock of the Farmers’ Bank of Hudson, as assets belonging to the estate. The Supreme Court affirmed the surrogate’s decree, and the administrators appealed.

A transfer of the stock had been executed on the books of the bank, by the intestate, eight or nine days before his death, to his son, Levi Eowley, and a certificate of the stock made out by the bank, and delivered to Levi.

The sole question presented in the case was one of fact, as to the competency of the intestate to make the transfer. The Court of Appeals came to a different conclusion on that question from that of the courts below, and reversed the decrees of those courts, so far as they charged the administrators with the value of this stock.

(S. C., 8 N. Y. 358.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Deusen v. Rowley, 1 Seld. Notes 130 (N.Y. 1853).

1 Seld. Notes 130 (Van Deusen v. Rowley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Deusen v. . Rowley
8 N.Y. 358 (New York Court of Appeals, 1853)