Van Der Werken v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Van Der Werken v. Katz

227 A.D. 820

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1929

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 227 A.D. 820 (Van Der Werken v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Der Werken v. Katz, 227 A.D. 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Order dismissing complaint and counterclaim, and judgment entered thereon, reversed upon the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The complaint states a good cause of action and the answer states a good counterclaim. The trial and not the pleadings must settle the dispute in this case. (N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 246 N. Y. 40, 45.) Rich, Kapper, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dismissing complaint and counterclaim, and judgment entered thereon, reversed upon the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The complaint states a good cause of action and the answer states a good counterclaim. The trial and not the pleadings must settle the dispute in this case. (N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 246 N. Y. 40, 45.) Rich, Kapper, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D. 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-der-werken-v-katz-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack