Van Der Werken v. Katz
227 A.D. 820
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order dismissing complaint and counterclaim, and judgment entered thereon, reversed upon the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The complaint states a good cause of action and the answer states a good counterclaim. The trial and not the pleadings must settle the dispute in this case. (N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 246 N. Y. 40, 45.) Rich, Kapper, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Der Werken v. Katz, 227 A.D. 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
227 A.D. 820 (Van Der Werken v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ondrejka v. Ondrejka
90 N.W.2d 615 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1958)
Madigan v. City of Onalaska
41 N.W.2d 206 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1950)
Madigan v. Onalaska
41 N.W.2d 206 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1950)