Van Der Meulen v. Van Der Meulen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Van Der Meulen v. Van Der Meulen

221 So. 3d 792, 2017 WL 2989008, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10103

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 14, 2017

DocketCase No. 2D15-5711

StatusPublished

This text of 221 So. 3d 792 (Van Der Meulen v. Van Der Meulen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Der Meulen v. Van Der Meulen, 221 So. 3d 792, 2017 WL 2989008, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10103 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Laura Van Der Meulen, the Former Wife, seeks review of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. She challenges the calculation of both parties’ incomes, the requirement that she pay real estate taxes from the temporary support award, and the equal allocation of the children’s un-reimbursed medical expenses. Michael Van Der Meulen, the Former Husband, properly concedes that the trial court erred in failing to allocate the unreimbursed medical expenses on a percentage basis. See § 61.30(8), Fla. Stat. (2011); Zinovoy v. Zinovoy, 50 So.3d 763, 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Finding no reversible error in the Former Wife’s remaining arguments, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for the reallocation of the children’s un-reimbursed medical expenses.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CRENSHAW and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Laura Van Der Meulen, the Former Wife, seeks review of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. She challenges the calculation of both parties’ incomes, the requirement that she pay real estate taxes from the temporary support award, and the equal allocation of the children’s un-reimbursed medical expenses. Michael Van Der Meulen, the Former Husband, properly concedes that the trial court erred in failing to allocate the unreimbursed medical expenses on a percentage basis. See § 61.30(8), Fla. Stat. (2011); Zinovoy v. Zinovoy, 50 So.3d 763, 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Finding no reversible error in the Former Wife’s remaining arguments, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for the reallocation of the children’s un-reimbursed medical expenses.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CRENSHAW and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 So. 3d 792, 2017 WL 2989008, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-der-meulen-v-van-der-meulen-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack