Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Tillyer

Ohio Circuit Courts

Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Tillyer

19 Ohio C.C. 635

Ohio Circuit Courts·Decided October 15, 1899·Published

Opinion

Hale, J.

The motion to dismiss the petition in error is overruled.

The plaintiff in error by his motion asked that the defendant in error be dismissed for the reason that since the commencement of these proceedings, the judgment, sought to be reversed, has been settled and paid.' This the defendant in error denies.

We are of the opinion that where an alleged settlement and payment are contested, an issue is made that can not be properly tried upon affidavits. An issue should be made by proper pleadings and trial upon evidence had as in other issues.

Of the many cases examined, we cite, as sustaining this proposition: 24 Mich., 408; 38 N. Y. Sup. Ct., 74; 32 Ohio St., 76.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hale, J.

The motion to dismiss the petition in error is overruled.

The plaintiff in error by his motion asked that the defendant in error be dismissed for the reason that since the commencement of these proceedings, the judgment, sought to be reversed, has been settled and paid.' This the defendant in error denies.

We are of the opinion that where an alleged settlement and payment are contested, an issue is made that can not be properly tried upon affidavits. An issue should be made by proper pleadings and trial upon evidence had as in other issues.

Of the many cases examined, we cite, as sustaining this proposition: 24 Mich., 408; 38 N. Y. Sup. Ct., 74; 32 Ohio St., 76.

Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Tillyer, 19 Ohio C.C. 635 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

19 Ohio C.C. 635 (Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Tillyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related