Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Tillyer

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 396
Cuyahoga Circuit Court·Decided December 22, 1899·Published

Opinion

Hale, J.

The motion to dismiss the petition in error is overruled.

The plaintiff in error, by his motion, asked that the defendant in error be dismissed for the reason that since the commencement of these ..proceedings, the judgment sought to be reversed has been settled and paid This the defendant in error denies.

[397]*397We are of llie opinion that where an alleged settlement and payment are contested, an issue is made that can not be properly tried upon affidavits. An issue should be be made by proper pleadings and trial upon evidence had as in other issues.

Of the many cases examined, we cite, as sustaining this proposition: Collins v. Dairs, 32 Ohio St., 76; 24 Mich., 408; 38 N. Y. Sup. Ct., 74; 32 O. S., 76.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Tillyer, 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 396 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 396 (Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Tillyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Parker v. Judge of Calhoun Circuit
24 Mich. 408 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1872)