Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Tillyer

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Tillyer

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 396

DecidedDecember 22, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 396 (Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Tillyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Cleve Glass Co. v. Tillyer, 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 396 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Hale, J.

The motion to dismiss the petition in error is overruled.

The plaintiff in error, by his motion, asked that the defendant in error be dismissed for the reason that since the commencement of these ..proceedings, the judgment sought to be reversed has been settled and paid This the defendant in error denies.

[397]*397We are of llie opinion that where an alleged settlement and payment are contested, an issue is made that can not be properly tried upon affidavits. An issue should be be made by proper pleadings and trial upon evidence had as in other issues.

Of the many cases examined, we cite, as sustaining this proposition: Collins v. Dairs, 32 Ohio St., 76; 24 Mich., 408; 38 N. Y. Sup. Ct., 74; 32 O. S., 76.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI