Van Cleef v. Maxfield
186 A.D. 906, 172 N.Y.S. 923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1918·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Under the pleadings the judgment and order must be affirmed, but it is the opinion of the court that the defendant should be permitted to make an application at the Special Term to open the judgment and amend the answer to plead, a gift, as he may be advised. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, Thomas, Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Cleef v. Maxfield, 186 A.D. 906, 172 N.Y.S. 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
186 A.D. 906 (Van Cleef v. Maxfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Carr
99 A.D.2d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
In re the Estate of Stein
50 Misc. 2d 627 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1966)
Russell Estate
123 A.2d 708 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Brown
130 Misc. 865 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1927)
Baltes v. Klief
206 N.W. 877 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1926)
In re the Estate of Wendell
121 Misc. 569 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1923)