Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Van Cleef v. Maxfield

Van Cleef v. Maxfield

186 A.D. 906, 172 N.Y.S. 923
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 186 A.D. 906 (Van Cleef v. Maxfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Cleef v. Maxfield, 186 A.D. 906, 172 N.Y.S. 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Under the pleadings the judgment and order must be affirmed, but it is the opinion of the court that the defendant should be permitted to make an application at the Special Term to open the judgment and amend the answer to plead, a gift, as he may be advised. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, Thomas, Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Carr
99 A.D.2d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
In re the Estate of Stein
50 Misc. 2d 627 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1966)
Russell Estate
123 A.2d 708 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Brown
130 Misc. 865 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1927)
Baltes v. Klief
206 N.W. 877 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1926)
In re the Estate of Wendell
121 Misc. 569 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 A.D. 906, 172 N.Y.S. 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-cleef-v-maxfield-nyappdiv-1918.