Van Buren v. PANTHER CRANKSHAFTS

Michigan Supreme Court

Van Buren v. PANTHER CRANKSHAFTS

755 N.W.2d 179, 482 Mich. 976

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 2008·No. 136593·Published

Opinion

755 N.W.2d 179 (2008)

Kisha VAN BUREN, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Izeair Kendall Bell, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PANTHER CRANKSHAFTS, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 136593. COA No. 275435.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 9, 2008.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

755 N.W.2d 179 (2008)

Kisha VAN BUREN, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Izeair Kendall Bell, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PANTHER CRANKSHAFTS, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 136593. COA No. 275435.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 9, 2008.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Van Buren v. PANTHER CRANKSHAFTS, 755 N.W.2d 179, 482 Mich. 976 (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

755 N.W.2d 179 (Van Buren v. PANTHER CRANKSHAFTS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Kisha VAN BUREN, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Izeair Kendall Bell, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PANTHER CRANKSHAFTS, Defendant-Appellee.

Kisha VAN BUREN, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Izeair Kendall Bell, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PANTHER CRANKSHAFTS, Defendant-Appellee.