Van Blarcom v. Van Blarcom
199 A. 383, 124 N.J. Eq. 19, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 696
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Lewis in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None. *Page 20
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Blarcom v. Van Blarcom, 199 A. 383, 124 N.J. Eq. 19, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 696 (N.J. 1938).
199 A. 383 (Van Blarcom v. Van Blarcom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hogg v. Walker
622 A.2d 648 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1993)
TR. OF CLIENTS'SEC. FUND v. Miller
578 A.2d 887 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
TR. OF CLIENTS'SEC. FUND v. Yucht
578 A.2d 900 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
Capital Investors Co. v. Executors of the Estate of Morrison
800 F.2d 424 (Fourth Circuit, 1986)