Van Bibber v. Laster
This text of 709 S.W.2d 90 (Van Bibber v. Laster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On March 15,1984, at approximately 9 p.m., appellant, Thomas H. Van Bibber, was hit by appellee’s car while he was crossing the street. Dr. Van Bibber and his wife sued the appellee for injuries he suffered as a result of the accident. A jury verdict in favor of the appellee was returned, arid the appellants appeal pro se.
We must affirm this case because the appellants have failed to abstract any of the testimony or the pleadings which are essential for us to review their case. See Rule 9, Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. The fact the appellants are pro se is immaterial. Bryant v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 302, 705 S.W.2d 9 (1986).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
709 S.W.2d 90, 289 Ark. 87, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 1915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-bibber-v-laster-ark-1986.