Van Beuren v. Wotherspoon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Van Beuren v. Wotherspoon

22 A.D. 628

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D. 628 (Van Beuren v. Wotherspoon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Beuren v. Wotherspoon, 22 A.D. 628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The referee followed strictly the directions contained in the order made by the Appellate Division. The value of the lot, without the buildings, was fixed at §100,000, and the value ot the buildings at §15,100. The principle upon which these valuations were made was correct. We cannot assent to the correctness of the views expressed by the appellants’ counsel upon this subject. The value of the use and occupation of the premises from the time of the expiration of the lease was fixed at §9,000 per year, which was precisely the amount of rent received by the defendants from their lessees. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Williams, Patterson, O’Brien and Ingraham. JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The referee followed strictly the directions contained in the order made by the Appellate Division. The value of the lot, without the buildings, was fixed at §100,000, and the value ot the buildings at §15,100. The principle upon which these valuations were made was correct. We cannot assent to the correctness of the views expressed by the appellants’ counsel upon this subject. The value of the use and occupation of the premises from the time of the expiration of the lease was fixed at §9,000 per year, which was precisely the amount of rent received by the defendants from their lessees. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Williams, Patterson, O’Brien and Ingraham. JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D. 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-beuren-v-wotherspoon-nyappdiv-1897.