Van Beuren v. D'Azevedo

32 Misc. 776, 66 N.Y.S. 1146
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 776 (Van Beuren v. D'Azevedo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Beuren v. D'Azevedo, 32 Misc. 776, 66 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Opinion

Hascall, J.

We find that no sufficient reason has been presented for disturbing the record below.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs and disbursements to respondent.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Misc. 776, 66 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-beuren-v-dazevedo-nynyccityct-1900.