Van Benthuysen v. Wackerbach

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Van Benthuysen v. Wackerbach

1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 17

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 1, 1880

DocketNo. 6618

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 17 (Van Benthuysen v. Wackerbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Benthuysen v. Wackerbach, 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 17 (La. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

On application for rehearing.

Manning, C. J.

We are surprised to find the appellants are entitled to have the case removed from the summary docket. The article of the Code of Practice and the various statutes on the subject were cited and reviewed, from which it appeared that promissory note cases had been omitted in the legislative changes. The case was ordered to be removed from the summary docket. The attention of the legislature having been thus attracted, this omission was supplied (Acts 1878 p. 45), and the suit was replaced on the summary docket and judgment summarily rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On application for rehearing.

Manning, C. J.

We are surprised to find the appellants are entitled to have the case removed from the summary docket. The article of the Code of Practice and the various statutes on the subject were cited and reviewed, from which it appeared that promissory note cases had been omitted in the legislative changes. The case was ordered to be removed from the summary docket. The attention of the legislature having been thus attracted, this omission was supplied (Acts 1878 p. 45), and the suit was replaced on the summary docket and judgment summarily rendered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-benthuysen-v-wackerbach-la-1880.