Van Benthuysen v. New England & Western Railroad
This text of 17 N.Y.S. 709 (Van Benthuysen v. New England & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff had the right to bring the action in case of a refusal by the trustees. The tender was not sufficient to arrest the action, unless it was a tender of all the interest upon the bonds which had nob agreed to postpone their claim to interest. Assuming a default, and the plaintiff’s right to sue, it is not material whether the affairs of the defendant are properly managed. The bondholders are entitled to take possession by a receiver and manage the property. The present management has no right in such a case, even it honest and capable. The order refusing a receiver should be reversed, with costs and disbursements, and the receiver appointed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 N.Y.S. 709, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 16, 63 Hun 627, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-benthuysen-v-new-england-western-railroad-nysupct-1892.