Van Baalen v. Cotney
71 N.W. 491, 113 Mich. 202, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 753
Opinion
The complainant and appellant filed the bill in this cause to foreclose a mortgage made October 26, 1893, by Catherine Cotney, upon premises which she had previously sold on a written contract to Paeschke, and which he sold to Wallinger on April 5, 1892. Wallinger took immediate possession, and has retained it since. This possession was constructive notice of his rights, and the circuit judge was justified in denying foreclosure, and requiring the complainant to discharge the mortgage.
His decree is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Baalen v. Cotney, 71 N.W. 491, 113 Mich. 202, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 753 (Mich. 1897).
71 N.W. 491 (Van Baalen v. Cotney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sams
802 S.W.2d 635 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 1990)
Kenneth Walker and Josephine Walker v. Fairbanks Investment Company
268 F.2d 48 (Ninth Circuit, 1959)
Quaschneck v. Blodgett
156 N.W. 216 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)