Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Van Baalen v. Cotney

Van Baalen v. Cotney

71 N.W. 491, 113 Mich. 202, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 753
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 28, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 71 N.W. 491 (Van Baalen v. Cotney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Baalen v. Cotney, 71 N.W. 491, 113 Mich. 202, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 753 (Mich. 1897).

Opinion

Hooker, J.

The complainant and appellant filed the bill in this cause to foreclose a mortgage made October 26, 1893, by Catherine Cotney, upon premises which she had previously sold on a written contract to Paeschke, and which he sold to Wallinger on April 5, 1892. Wallinger took immediate possession, and has retained it since. This possession was constructive notice of his rights, and the circuit judge was justified in denying foreclosure, and requiring the complainant to discharge the mortgage.

His decree is affirmed, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sams
802 S.W.2d 635 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 1990)
Kenneth Walker and Josephine Walker v. Fairbanks Investment Company
268 F.2d 48 (Ninth Circuit, 1959)
Quaschneck v. Blodgett
156 N.W. 216 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 N.W. 491, 113 Mich. 202, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-baalen-v-cotney-mich-1897.