Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Van Arsdale v. Gorenflo

Van Arsdale v. Gorenflo

116 A. 869, 93 N.J. Eq. 486, 8 Stock. 486, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 320
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 2, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 116 A. 869 (Van Arsdale v. Gorenflo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Arsdale v. Gorenflo, 116 A. 869, 93 N.J. Eq. 486, 8 Stock. 486, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 320 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

[491]*491For affirmance — Tiie Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbact-i, Wi-iite, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yak Buskirii — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simonson v. Z Cranbury Associates
695 A.2d 222 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1997)
Anthony v. Almorth
2 Conn. Super. Ct. 112 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1935)
Bruen v. Spannhake
178 A. 73 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Heilos v. State Land Co.
166 A. 330 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Malba Terrace Corp. v. Portaupeck Properties
148 A. 206 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 A. 869, 93 N.J. Eq. 486, 8 Stock. 486, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-arsdale-v-gorenflo-nj-1922.