Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Van Arsdale v. Gorenflo

Van Arsdale v. Gorenflo

116 A. 869, 93 N.J. Eq. 486, 8 Stock. 486, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 320
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 2, 1922·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

[491]*491For affirmance — Tiie Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbact-i, Wi-iite, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yak Buskirii — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Arsdale v. Gorenflo, 116 A. 869, 93 N.J. Eq. 486, 8 Stock. 486, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 320 (N.J. 1922).

116 A. 869 (Van Arsdale v. Gorenflo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simonson v. Z Cranbury Associates
695 A.2d 222 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1997)
Anthony v. Almorth
2 Conn. Super. Ct. 112 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1935)
Bruen v. Spannhake
178 A. 73 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Heilos v. State Land Co.
166 A. 330 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Malba Terrace Corp. v. Portaupeck Properties
148 A. 206 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)