Van Arsdale v. Congregational Home Missionary Society
44 A. 1099, 59 N.J. Eq. 658, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 168
This text of 44 A. 1099 (Van Arsdale v. Congregational Home Missionary Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Van Arsdale v. Congregational Home Missionary Society, 44 A. 1099, 59 N.J. Eq. 658, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 168 (N.J. 1899).
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice,’Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Nixon, Vredenburgi-i — 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Hoffman
147 A.2d 545 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 A. 1099, 59 N.J. Eq. 658, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-arsdale-v-congregational-home-missionary-society-nj-1899.