Van Arsdale v. Congregational Home Missionary Society
44 A. 1099, 59 N.J. Eq. 658, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 168
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice,’Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Nixon, Vredenburgi-i — 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Arsdale v. Congregational Home Missionary Society, 44 A. 1099, 59 N.J. Eq. 658, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 168 (N.J. 1899).
44 A. 1099 (Van Arsdale v. Congregational Home Missionary Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Hoffman
147 A.2d 545 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)