Van Allen v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Van Allen v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport

12 N.J. Misc. 635

DecidedJuly 1, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 12 N.J. Misc. 635 (Van Allen v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Allen v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport, 12 N.J. Misc. 635 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Yan Pipes, C. P. J.

The above-entitled matter coming on to be heard before me, one of the judges of the Essex County Court of Common Pleas, in the presence of Benjamin J. Downer, Esquire, attorney for petitioner-appellee and Henry H. Fryling, Esquire, .attorney for the respondent-appellant, on appeal from a judgment of the workmen’s compensation bureau denying the respondent-appellant a more specific bill of particulars, and it appearing from the certified transcript before me that the ■respondent, Public Service Co-ordinated Transport, demanded of the attorney of the petitioner before answer was filed, a bill of particulars.

And it further appearing that the petitioner served upon the respondent company a bill of particulars as follows:

And it further appearing that the respondent, Public Service Co-ordinated Transport, gave notice to the attorney of the petitioner by its attorney that it would apply to one of the deputy commissioners of the workmen’s compensation [636]*636bureau for a more specific bill of particulars, aud it appearing that the workmen’s compensation bureau by its deputy-commissioner, Charles E. Corbin, entered a judgment against, the respondent on its motion for a more specific bill of particulars, and after considering the argument of the respective-counsel on the briefs as filed in this appeal, I am satisfied that the respondent-appellant was entitled to a more complete-bill of particulars upon its application made before the deputy commissioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yan Pipes, C. P. J.

The above-entitled matter coming on to be heard before me, one of the judges of the Essex County Court of Common Pleas, in the presence of Benjamin J. Downer, Esquire, attorney for petitioner-appellee and Henry H. Fryling, Esquire, .attorney for the respondent-appellant, on appeal from a judgment of the workmen’s compensation bureau denying the respondent-appellant a more specific bill of particulars, and it appearing from the certified transcript before me that the ■respondent, Public Service Co-ordinated Transport, demanded of the attorney of the petitioner before answer was filed, a bill of particulars.

And it further appearing that the petitioner served upon the respondent company a bill of particulars as follows:

And it further appearing that the respondent, Public Service Co-ordinated Transport, gave notice to the attorney of the petitioner by its attorney that it would apply to one of the deputy commissioners of the workmen’s compensation [636]*636bureau for a more specific bill of particulars, aud it appearing that the workmen’s compensation bureau by its deputy-commissioner, Charles E. Corbin, entered a judgment against, the respondent on its motion for a more specific bill of particulars, and after considering the argument of the respective-counsel on the briefs as filed in this appeal, I am satisfied that the respondent-appellant was entitled to a more complete-bill of particulars upon its application made before the deputy commissioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 N.J. Misc. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-allen-v-public-service-co-ordinated-transport-pactcompl-1934.