Van Aken v. State
This text of 236 A.D. 872 (Van Aken v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the damage was entirely incidental to the taking of the property. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Hill and Crapser, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment on the law and facts and for a new trial, and to reverse findings of fact 11, 12 and 13. (Adamo v. State of New York, 235 App. Div. 12.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-aken-v-state-nyappdiv-1932.