Van Acker v. Bloss
This text of 166 N.W.2d 8 (Van Acker v. Bloss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs appeal from a directed verdict of no cause for action in this slip and fall ease. Plaintiff Harriet Van Acker was a tuition-paying student in defendant’s beauty school.
A review of the trial transcript convinces this Court that a question of fact was presented on the alleged negligence of defendant in failing to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition for plaintiff, an invitee.
Reversed and remanded for trial. Plaintiffs may recover costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 N.W.2d 8, 14 Mich. App. 761, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-acker-v-bloss-michctapp-1968.