Van Acker v. Bloss

166 N.W.2d 8, 14 Mich. App. 761, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 994
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 19, 1968
DocketDocket No. 4,720
StatusPublished

This text of 166 N.W.2d 8 (Van Acker v. Bloss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Acker v. Bloss, 166 N.W.2d 8, 14 Mich. App. 761, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 994 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs appeal from a directed verdict of no cause for action in this slip and fall ease. Plaintiff Harriet Van Acker was a tuition-paying student in defendant’s beauty school.

A review of the trial transcript convinces this Court that a question of fact was presented on the alleged negligence of defendant in failing to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition for plaintiff, an invitee.

Reversed and remanded for trial. Plaintiffs may recover costs.

T. G-. Kavanagh, P. J., and Quinn and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 N.W.2d 8, 14 Mich. App. 761, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-acker-v-bloss-michctapp-1968.