Vamco Enterprises, Inc. v. Sandberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vamco Enterprises, Inc. v. Sandberg

130 A.D.2d 739, 515 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46752

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.2d 739 (Vamco Enterprises, Inc. v. Sandberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vamco Enterprises, Inc. v. Sandberg, 130 A.D.2d 739, 515 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for tortious interference with contractual relations, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated September 4, 1986, as denied their motion for a protective order striking certain interrogatories propounded by the plaintiff.

Ordered that the order is modified, by granting those branches of the defendants’ motion which were to strike the plaintiff’s interrogatories numbered 35 (a) and (c), 38 and 39. As so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The defendants’ time to answer the remaining interrogatories is extended to 20 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

Based upon a review of the record herein, we find that the plaintiff’s interrogatories numbered 35 (a) and (c), 38 and 39 request the disclosure of information which is neither relevant nor material to the claims at issue in this action. Accordingly, these interrogatories are hereby stricken and the defendants should answer the remaining interrogatories. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for tortious interference with contractual relations, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated September 4, 1986, as denied their motion for a protective order striking certain interrogatories propounded by the plaintiff.

Ordered that the order is modified, by granting those branches of the defendants’ motion which were to strike the plaintiff’s interrogatories numbered 35 (a) and (c), 38 and 39. As so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The defendants’ time to answer the remaining interrogatories is extended to 20 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

Based upon a review of the record herein, we find that the plaintiff’s interrogatories numbered 35 (a) and (c), 38 and 39 request the disclosure of information which is neither relevant nor material to the claims at issue in this action. Accordingly, these interrogatories are hereby stricken and the defendants should answer the remaining interrogatories. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.2d 739, 515 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vamco-enterprises-inc-v-sandberg-nyappdiv-1987.