Vamattam v. Yohannan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vamattam v. Yohannan

204 A.D.2d 435, 614 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4854

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.2d 435 (Vamattam v. Yohannan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vamattam v. Yohannan, 204 A.D.2d 435, 614 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage the defendants Mathai K. Yohannan and Elcy Yohannan appeal from an order of the [436]*436Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated July 27, 1992, which, inter alia, denied their motion to vacate a prior order of the same court dated November 2, 1991, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and struck the answer of the defendants Yohannan.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Due to the failure of the defendants Yohannan to offer any reasonable excuse for having failed to oppose the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion to vacate its prior order granting summary judgment to the plaintiff (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Gannon v Johnson Scale Co., 189 AD2d 1052). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage the defendants Mathai K. Yohannan and Elcy Yohannan appeal from an order of the [436]*436Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated July 27, 1992, which, inter alia, denied their motion to vacate a prior order of the same court dated November 2, 1991, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and struck the answer of the defendants Yohannan.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Due to the failure of the defendants Yohannan to offer any reasonable excuse for having failed to oppose the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion to vacate its prior order granting summary judgment to the plaintiff (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Gannon v Johnson Scale Co., 189 AD2d 1052). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 435, 614 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vamattam-v-yohannan-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack