Value Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ajemian
This text of 509 So. 2d 1388 (Value Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ajemian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A default was entered on liability against appellant, followed by a trial and judgment for damages. From an order denying appellant’s motion for relief from said judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540, this appeal has been perfected.
We find no reversible error because appellant failed to demonstrate either excusable neglect, Moore v. Powell, 480 So.2d 137 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 492 So.2d 1333 (1986); Allen v. Wright, 350 So.2d 111 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), or a meritorious defense, Moore, 480 So.2d 137; Westinghouse Elevator Company v. DFS Construction Company, 438 So.2d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Napco Paints, Inc. v. LaPorte (U.S.), Inc., 490 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
509 So. 2d 1388, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1847, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/value-rent-a-car-inc-v-ajemian-fladistctapp-1987.