Value Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ajemian

509 So. 2d 1388, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1847, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9555
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1987·No. No. 4-86-2475·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A default was entered on liability against appellant, followed by a trial and judgment for damages. From an order denying appellant’s motion for relief from said judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540, this appeal has been perfected.

We find no reversible error because appellant failed to demonstrate either excusable neglect, Moore v. Powell, 480 So.2d 137 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 492 So.2d 1333 (1986); Allen v. Wright, 350 So.2d 111 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), or a meritorious defense, Moore, 480 So.2d 137; Westinghouse Elevator Company v. DFS Construction Company, 438 So.2d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Napco Paints, Inc. v. LaPorte (U.S.), Inc., 490 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Value Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ajemian, 509 So. 2d 1388, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1847, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9555 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

509 So. 2d 1388 (Value Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ajemian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Powell
480 So. 2d 137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Westinghouse Elev. Co. v. Dfs Const. Co.
438 So. 2d 125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Napco Paints, Inc. v. LaPorte (US), Inc.
490 So. 2d 1023 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Allen v. Wright
350 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)