Value Management Consultants, Inc. v. County of Nassau

274 A.D.2d 588, 711 N.Y.S.2d 497, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8340
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 31, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 274 A.D.2d 588 (Value Management Consultants, Inc. v. County of Nassau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Value Management Consultants, Inc. v. County of Nassau, 274 A.D.2d 588, 711 N.Y.S.2d 497, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent County of Nassau, awarding a transportation management contract to the respondent Hudson General, L. L. C., the petitioner Value Management Consultants, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated May 7, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The petitioner failed to sustain its burden of demonstrating that the transportation management contract at issue was improperly awarded (see, Matter of Acme Bus Corp. v Board of Educ., 91 NY2d 51, 55). The determination of the respondent County of Nassau to award the contract to the respondent Hudson General, L. L. C. (hereinafter Hudson), notwithstanding that Hudson was not the lowest bidder, was in accord with the law and had a rational basis (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 230-231; Matter of Chadha v County of Nassau, 248 AD2d 465, 466-467). Hudson had provided transportation services for the County since 1986, had established an excellent reputation and knowledge of the transportation program, and had proposed a use of computerized routing and scheduling systems which was more cost effective and efficient than that submitted by the petitioner.

Moreover, the petitioner failed to demonstrate the existence of any factual issues requiring a hearing. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding. Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dreier v. LaValle
29 A.D.3d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Service Bus Co. v. City School District of Yonkers
20 A.D.3d 483 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.D.2d 588, 711 N.Y.S.2d 497, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/value-management-consultants-inc-v-county-of-nassau-nyappdiv-2000.