Valora v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Valora v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund

884 A.2d 250

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Valora v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund. Read the opinion of the Court — 595 Pa. 574 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 4, 2005·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it ignored Petitioner’s contractual right to subrogation and treated this as a case of equitable subro-gation?

2. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it relied on precedent under the Worker’s Compensation Act to arrive at its conclusion that Petitioner was required to pursue its subro-gation rights diligently?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it ignored Petitioner’s contractual right to subrogation and treated this as a case of equitable subro-gation?

2. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it relied on precedent under the Worker’s Compensation Act to arrive at its conclusion that Petitioner was required to pursue its subro-gation rights diligently?

Valora v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund, 884 A.2d 250 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

884 A.2d 250 (Valora v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.