Valley Women's Clinic, P.A. v. William Nacey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Valley Women's Clinic, P.A. v. William Nacey

DecidedDecember 7, 2000

Docket13-00-00498-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Valley Women's Clinic, P.A. v. William Nacey (Valley Women's Clinic, P.A. v. William Nacey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valley Women's Clinic, P.A. v. William Nacey, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-00-498-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

VALLEY WOMEN'S CLINIC, P.A.

, Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM NACEY

, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N Before Justice Hinojosa, Yañez, and Chavez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, VALLEY WOMEN'S CLINIC, P.A., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2000-03-1115-B. After the record was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and appellant no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 7^th day of December, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-00-498-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

VALLEY WOMEN'S CLINIC, P.A.

, Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM NACEY

, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N Before Justice Hinojosa, Yañez, and Chavez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, VALLEY WOMEN'S CLINIC, P.A., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2000-03-1115-B. After the record was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and appellant no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 7^th day of December, 2000.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Valley Women's Clinic, P.A. v. William Nacey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valley-womens-clinic-pa-v-william-nacey-texapp-2000.