Valley Township Poor District v. Northumberland Borough Poor District

4 Pa. D. & C. 200, 1923 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 326
CourtMontour County Court of Quarter Sessions
DecidedMay 28, 1923
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Pa. D. & C. 200 (Valley Township Poor District v. Northumberland Borough Poor District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montour County Court of Quarter Sessions primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valley Township Poor District v. Northumberland Borough Poor District, 4 Pa. D. & C. 200, 1923 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 326 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1923).

Opinion

Potter, P. J.,

17th judicial district, specially presiding, From the records filed in this case we gather, in substance, the following:

That Jacob L. Garman, a single man, resided in Valley Township, Montour County, up to March 30, 1913, when he was removed to the Hospital for the Insane at Danville.

A dispute arose between the poor authorities of Valley Township and those of the Borough of Northumberland as to the place of settlement of the said Garman, each claiming it to be the other.

Proceedings were had under the Act of April 6, 1905, P. L. 112, between these two municipalities, which resulted in a decree by the Court of Quarter Sessions of Montour County, wherein Northumberland was decreed to be the legal place of settlement of the said Garman.

With these proceedings up to this stage of the case we have nothing whatever to do, they being recited only as a matter of the history of the case eventually leading up to the matters before us, which appear from this on.

A bill of costs was presumably filed on the part of Valley Township, to which exceptions were filed, which exceptions are before this court, or are supposed to be, for disposition.

In point of fact, however, we can find no such exceptions among the files. Therefore, all we can do is to pass upon the exceptions as we gather them from briefs of counsel and as we remember them at the time of argument.

There appear to be two versions of this bill of costs, the following being filed, or supposed to have been filed, by R. S. Ammerman, Esq., counsel for Valley Township, as appears among the files:

[201]*201 Bill of costs of petitioner.
By cash, paid order of relief for James Garman........... .50
By cash, paid Dr. Shultz for medical service.............. 5.00
By cash, paid Dr. Patton, medical service................ 5.00
Affidavit of hospital.................................... 1.50
Harry Yeager, taking Garman to hospital............... 2.00
Pauline Farnsworth, affidavits.......................... .75
Sheriff Startzell........................•............... 2.50
Dr. H. B. Meredith, witness fees........................ 1.12
Hospital charges for keeping Garman at hospital, April 14,
1914, 55 weeks....................................... 95.00
Thomas Vincent, costs, Clerk of the Court of Quarter
Sessions ............................................ 10.00
Counsel fees........................................... 50.00
$173.37

This bill of costs is not marked “filed,” but, inasmuch as it is among the papers of the case, we will presume it to have been filed. It should have been so marked.

From the brief of counsel for the Borough of Northumberland, as well as from a loose paper among the files, we find the following bill:

Order of relief for Jacob L. Garman..................... $2.50
Dr. Shultz, medical services............................ 5.00
Dr. Patton, medical services........................... 5.00
Affidavit to certificate for admission to hospital........... 1.50
Harry Yeager, carriage taking Garman to hospital........ 2.00
Pauline F. Farnsworth, notary public, affidavits.......... .75
Sheriff Startzell....................................... 2.50
Dr. H. B. Meredith, witness, one day and mileage.......... 1.12
Mrs. Lytle, witness, one day and mileage................. 1.24
Hospital charges for keeping Garman from March 30, 1912, to April 20, 1914, 55 weeks, at $1.76 per week.......... 96.25
T. A. Benfield, director of the poor, for service, &c........ 10.00
W. David Wise, director of the poor, for service, &c...... 10.00
William Reeser, director of the poor, for service, &c....... 5.00
Thomas C. Vincent, Clerk Quarter Sessions, fees.......... 10.00
Attorney fees.......................................... 75.00
Certified record, Northumberland County................ 4.00
$231.86

We are at a loss to know which of these two bills is to be regarded as the official one. We will, therefore, make up a bill of costs, expenses and relief, to which, we think, the winning party is entitled.

We find the fee for a justice of the peace on the issuance of an order of relief to be 50 cents, by the Act of April 23, 1909, P. L. 160, and, there being two justices, they would be entitled to the sum of $1, to which should be added the sum of 25 cents each for docket entry, thus making the total of this charge to be $1.50.

The two items of $5 each to Dr. Shultz and to Dr. Patton, so far as light is shed on these two charges, seem to be correct, they apparently having rendered medical service to Garman of some kind, and they are allowed.

[202]*202The item of $1.50 for certificate for admission to the hospital, in the face of no opposition and no information against it, is allowed.

The item of $2 to Harry Yeager for conveying Garman to the hospital seems to be within the law governing these proceedings, and it is allowed.

The item of 75 cents to Pauline F. Farnsworth for affidavits is also allowed.

The item of $2.50 to Sheriff Startzell is disallowed, for the reason that there is nothing whatever to show what service he rendered. When a party is called upon to pay money he has a right to know what he is paying it for. In this charge, all we have is the following: “Sheriff Startzell, $2.50.” We do not know if he rendered his official service, or whether he rendered service as.a private individual, or whether his service, if any, was necessary, or whether it was within the meaning and contemplation of the act of assembly. This we are entitled to know, and so is Northumberland Borough, who must pay the bill.

The items of Dr. Meredith, $1.12, and Mrs. Lytle, $1.24, for witness fees and mileage, are legitimate charges, and are allowed.

There appears to be no dispute concerning the item of $96.25 for the maintenance of Garman in the hospital from March 30, 1912, to April 20, 1914, fifty-five weeks, at $1.75 per week. This item falls within the statute, and it is allowed.

The claims of T. A. Benfield, $10, W. David Wise, $10, and William Reeser, $5, directors of the poor, for services, are not allowed, for the reason that there is no warrant in the law for them.

The claim of Thomas C. Vincent of $10, as Clerk of the Court of Quarter Sessions, we think, is proper, and it is allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Overseers of the Poor v. Overseers of the Poor
11 Pa. Super. 215 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Westmoreland County Poor District's Appeal
77 Pa. Super. 402 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Pa. D. & C. 200, 1923 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valley-township-poor-district-v-northumberland-borough-poor-district-paqtrsessmontou-1923.