Valley Stream Refuse Transfer Co. v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Valley Stream Refuse Transfer Co. v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream

70 A.D.2d 616, 416 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12036

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 616 (Valley Stream Refuse Transfer Co. v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valley Stream Refuse Transfer Co. v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, 70 A.D.2d 616, 416 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to prohibit the Incorporated Village of Valley Stream from executing a certain contract with Jamaica Ash Co., Inc., the appeals are from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 30, 1978, which granted the petition to the extent of determining that the acts of the village in advertising for and receiving bids were null and void and vacated the contract between the village and Jamaica Ash Co., Inc. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed. The petitioner has no standing (see Matter of Rockland Haulage v Village of Upper Nyack, 13 AD2d 819). Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett,- JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to prohibit the Incorporated Village of Valley Stream from executing a certain contract with Jamaica Ash Co., Inc., the appeals are from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 30, 1978, which granted the petition to the extent of determining that the acts of the village in advertising for and receiving bids were null and void and vacated the contract between the village and Jamaica Ash Co., Inc. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed. The petitioner has no standing (see Matter of Rockland Haulage v Village of Upper Nyack, 13 AD2d 819). Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett,- JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 616, 416 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valley-stream-refuse-transfer-co-v-incorporated-village-of-valley-stream-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack